Methodology · Frameworks · Head Start (US)
Head Start (US)
USA — federal programme since 1965, serves ~800,000 children annually
The US federal programme for low-income children ages 3–5. Emphasises school readiness, parent involvement, and health services alongside educational preparation.
Domain coverage
Framework vs developmental baseline — higher is more coverage
Developmental conflicts
Where this framework under-serves development
These domains receive significantly less coverage than developmental science recommends. The gap creates a mismatch between curriculum expectations and what children actually need at this stage.
Self-regulation, attention, and emotional awareness are developed through contemplative practice. These are the meta-skills underlying all learning — yet rarely appear in formal frameworks.
Practical life skills (cooking, tool use, care of environment) build agency, competence, and intrinsic motivation. Children need to do real things with real consequences.
Over-emphasis
Where this framework over-indexes
These domains receive far more emphasis than the developmental baseline suggests is proportional. Intense focus here may crowd out other developmental needs — particularly where time and attention are finite.
Premature academic pressure before age 6–7 competes with developmental tasks (play, motor, social) that have narrower windows. Post age 7, academic engagement should accelerate.
How conflicts are identified
Domain scores reflect how many distinct skills each framework defines in that area (sourced from official documents and research summaries). The developmental baseline is derived from the organic distribution of our canonical milestone set — what actually emerged when we clustered skills cross-culturally. A severe gap means the framework covers less than 30% of the developmental baseline in that domain. A moderate gap means 30–60% coverage. Over-indexed means more than 2× the baseline.